Thread:Birdpool/@comment-30204686-20170611034226/@comment-25230228-20170613225952

N00bslayer2016 wrote: really? stooping to vulgarities to attack something that isn't even for you to find fault with? Tsk tsk. Won't you even reply? Since you're not giving me a response as to why you think the grammar needs to be improved, I'll have to assume the putting of that tag was unwarranted and is vandalism. Look, I'm trying to be nice and spell out what I need clarification with. you're not even giving me the decency of a polite message? Are you this socially impaired in real life? If anything YOU are the socially impaired one here.

Also, I've never vandalized a page, ever. If **I** mark a page for grammar then it's because it's so broken that I don't care to fix it. If it's bad enough that ANYONE deems it seriously needs fixing and you can't se the error, then you really need to reevaluate...everything, actually.