Talk:Weed (PvZH)/@comment-31234217-20170610035826/@comment-28986274-20170611181532

lmao "calm down" nice overexaggeration

well, you can start by using this for the infobox. for pages, it just looks unprofessional to put your signature on it. remove it, it serves literally no purpose. the third piece of trivia is redundant as it's already mentioned in the strategy section. you could also include a "etymology" section that, as said by the name, covers the name - this adds more content to the article. for traits (official terminology effects), you should honestly only use them for plants that actually use effects.

in the sentences summarizing the card at the start, it's redundant to mention the 'weed deck' part. that, again, belongs in the strategies section.